USA and Iran Said to Be Close to Inking Nuclear Weapons Deal; Agreement Said to Contain 'Snap-Back' Provision Which Would Re-Implement Economic Sanctions if Iran is Proven to Have Violated Pact

BALTIMORE, Maryland July 12, 2015 - If your critical thinking tools are working even just a little bit, you should be in the coldest of sweats right now.  Word is leaking out that the United States and Iran have crossed all critical hurdles and are on the verge of inking an agreement concerning nuclear weapons.  According to their sources, Fox is reporting tonight that the deal will include an emaciated "snap back" provision that would come into play when there is a credible allegation that Iran has broken its obligations under the agreement.  If such an allegation is proven true, the economic sanctions currently imposed on Iran, and scheduled to be eliminated upon the deal being signed,  would be 'snapped back' into place as a penalty for the violation.  The provision said to be in the agreement currently on the table is being openly lambasted because Iran itself has a seat on the group that will judge whether the alleged violation has, in fact, occurred.  According to John Bolton, one of the world's premier foreign policy authorities and a former USA Ambassador to the United Nations, Iran will use such a seat to prolong and frustrate any allegation of violation against it.  In fact, Bolton and many other observers are saying openly that this agreement is far far worse than having no agreement at all.  It is almost certain, for instance, that the United States would be forfeiting its rights to take military action against Iran as the latter's ability to field a nuclear IBM draws near.  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin (Binyamin) "Bibi" Netanyahu, whose eloquent and impassioned speech before a joint session of the USA Congress in March, 2015, galvanized world-wide opposition to the concepts sought by President Obama in a deal with Iran.  In fact, it is believed that the USA has made even further concessions to Iran in an effort to gain an agreement with Iran.  At one point it was revealed that the Obama Administration objected to Iran's leadership that its ambassador at the negotiations was spending too much time screaming at USA negotiator John Kerry, the USA Secretary of State.   Last week, Kerry made it "clear" that he was prepared to walk out of the negotiations if Iran would not agree to providing access to all suspected nuclear sites.  This week, sources say that the USA will ink the deal without access to all sites being provided.  

One critical weakness to the entire negotiations and the manner in which President Obama and Kerry have conducted them is that botm men are extreme 'uber' leftists who have made it clear that they are hell-bent on getting a deal, and Obama has even conceded that he considers such an agreement to be the key foreign policy accomplishment of his soon-to-be eight years in office.  Neither man has given any reason not to believe that these criticisms are anything but extremely accurate.