New York Times in Desperate Ploy to Save Hilary's Presidential Chances

BALTIMORE, Maryland December 28, 2013 - If it wasn't so potentially important, you'd laugh at it.  Over one year after the Benghazi, Libya massacre of four American Citizens, including the U. S. Ambassador to Libya, the New York Times is going to press with a shabby piece of jouranlism that tries to resurrect the anti-Muslim video connection to the attacks.

I admit, up front, that I have not read the Times article as I post this blog at 7:40 pm on Saturday, December 28, 2013, only a USA Today summary of it.  The purpose of the piece is to provide cover for Hilary Clinton's upcoming presidential bid.  Hilary was directly involved in all phases of the Benghazi cover-up, and the Times article is nothing short of a life-preserver for the as-yet-unannounced campaign.  As direct evidence mounts proving that Hilary and obama directly conspired to blame the video for sparking the attacks, Hilary's campaign chances appeared to dim.  Within days of the attacks, Hilary and obama stood at Andrews Air Force Base with spouses and parents of the four dead Americans - and with the four coffins standing next to both of them - and expressly blamed the video as the cause of the attacks.  Hilary was quoted as telling the father of one of the dead Americans, "I promise you that we will find and prosecute the makers of the video."

In fact, she and obama had spoken by phone within hours of the news that the four Americans were dead, to concoct this explanation for the attacks, after their abject failure to ramp up security at the annex in spite of repeated and increasingly desperate requests for security upgrades from Americans on the ground in Benghazi.  These requests were made during the months, weeks and days before the attack.  Before, during and after the attacks, obama was campaigning for re-election, and basing his bid in pertinent part on his claim that his killing of Osama bin laden had gutted al Qada and rendered it all but impotent as a source of international Islamic Terrorism.  Both Hilary and obama feared that an increase in security at Benghazi would fly in the face of obama's campaign boasts.  Only when the four were dead did he finally concede that al Qada was still a force to be reckoned with.  In fact, many security analysts have concluded that Osama bin laden had been phased out as a day-to-day leader of al Qada months or years before Navy Seals ambushed and killed the mastermind of the "9/11" massacre of thousands of Americans in New York, Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania. The intense international manhunt for bin Laden by western nations had made it impossible for al Qada to rely on bin Laden for on-going leadership decisions.

The video was made by a California man and was virtually unknown outside of his inner circle.  It had been posted on You Tube for months prior to the Benghazzi Massacre, but had  only had several dozen hits.

As Congressional Committees have continued a relentless investigation of the Benghazi Massacre, advisors to Hilary have privately worried that revelations could short-circuit her campaign.  This play by the far left-leaning New York Times to turn this investigation into a political battle is intended to throw Hilary a lifeline.