BALTIMORE, Maryland, Wednesday, October 19 and Thursday, October 20, 2016 - Hillary Clinton has learned, through the years, to speak at length on all matter of subjects so that she doesn't have to discuss her many illegal and immoral activities, activities and deeds which, if the American Voters learned about them, would certainly cost her the election. For instance: during tonight's final Presidential Debate in Las Vegas, Hillary bragged that the Clinton Foundation gives 90% of all money it takes in to the charities it says it supports.
Folks, this just is not true, except, perhaps, in the last year or so, when the public began scrutinizing the goings-on there and 'Hill and Bill' knew they had to get their books in order. Prior to this, the Clintons used these international contributions - which the nations and persons who made them believed would be purchasing influence in the forthcoming Clinton Administration - to support the opulent, indeed lavish and even garrish lifestyle the Clintons enjoy, or, as many said, flaunted. As they say, 'you can look it up.'
The mainstream media reports that Hillary gets her hair salon treatments at the extremely upscale Bergdorf Goodman, located on the south side of Central Park in Manhattan. The reports emphasize - as if this is a good thing - that each time Hillary drops in, her hairstyle costs ten thousand dollars. She didn't pay for that kind of nonsense on a government salary. No she did not.
Hillary was asked during the debate about taking money - contributions, she called them - from nations that regularly murder gay folk and torment LGBT folk. But she squirmed, like a snake, and got out of answering that question. Another question she slithered away from was the one about her enabling of her husband's full blown lecherous lifestyle. It is said he has had over one hundred such trysts. She is the enabler for his catting around. She knows it. She hopes you don't. And as long as most Americans aren't forced to confront this stuff, it won't stand in the way of both of them stumbling and bumbling their way back to the abode on Pennsylvania Avenue come January.
Near the end of the debate, Hillary let slip something that I fear went right over everybody's head. She said she wanted to begin to pay Federal benefits to "poorer" employed persons. Already, the United States is some $20 Trillion in debt, and the debt is getting very much bigger on a daily basis. Now, the United States is going to have to pay more Billions of Dollars to an entire new class of societal victims: people who are, in fact, gainfully employed but who are not making whatever amount Hillary and her functionaries think is appropriate. If their wage isn't what Hillary and friends (friends?) think is "fair," out comes Uncle Sam's well-worn check book and off goes another fat check to a 'deserving' USA citizen. How many millions of Americans will qualify to receive this fair and wonderfully deserving benefit. What will the federal debt be, say, about two years down wind from enactment of this new expedition into federal welfare? Chris Wallace and Trump did not pick this up. Did Hillary say this inadvertently or was it a planned utterance? It would be hard for me to believe this was said by mistake. Instead, I think she was giving an off-the-cuff announcement of this brand new benefit she has planned, a benefit for a whole new class of folk who will be getting regular checks from Uncle Sam; i.e., your wallet. It will certainly require an infusion of tax dollars to underwrite such a new benefit. It will be met with joy by those who will get the money, and, if she is elected, groans and resignation by the rest of us who will get stuck with the bill for her generosity. I sure hope I heard this wrong.
Throughout this debate, Hillary avoided speaking substantively about the revelations in the Wikileaks. Those revelations show the DNC and her campaign "team" to be nothing more than a bunch of white-collar thugs, snarks and fascists. And that is putting it mildly. But Trump, for reasons he has to live with, hardly brought it up. Once or twice in passing he said the words, but he never told listeners what the leaks are and, more importantly, what they reveal about Hillary.
Millions of Americans have no idea what Wikileaks are because the mainstream media, existing, as they clearly do, in Hillary's pocket, are not reporting on, much less explaining, these stunning factual revelations at all, except in passing reference. Chris Wallace asked a question based on one of the Wikileaks, but other than saying it was contained in the Wikileaks, that is all he did.
Wallace, incidentally, was by far the best and most fair of the moderators. But you understand that this is damning him with the faintest of praises. The other moderators for these Presidential "debates," were little more than teammates of Hillary. We still have no explanation for Lester Holt's "wiring," caught in photographs even though Holt and NBC agreed not to wear such electronic devices. Nor do we have comments on the apparent signalling that was going on between Hillary and her friend Holt. When these people begin to come up with this stuff, does their conscience ever bother them just a little bit? And why is our society so weak that an investigation into such documented rules violations is neither pursued or contemplated.
Then there is the Middle East, which is a totaldisgrace for the Obama Administration. When Obama took office eight years ago, Russia was not even a player in the Middle East. Now, as Trump explained last night, Russia is the top player in all things spinning out of the various conflicts there. Meanwhile, as Trump charged, the USA has meekly accepted Russia's new domination while getting out-smarted and out-maneuvered at every turn by Moscow.
Hillary voted for the Iraq invasion, as did virtually every other Democrat in the Congress, but you'd never have known that if you watched and listened to this final debate.
After the Democrats joined in the authorization of the Iraq war - remember, this was in the immediate aftermath of the horrific 9-11-2001 Islamic Terrorist Attack - the Democrats, including Hillary, got together and decided the war was going poorly. Suddenly, a war they supported seemed like a bad idea. Being the patriots and American Heroes these folk want you to believe they are, these Congressional Leftists came up with the really sinister idea of claiming they had been misled by President Bush about the existence of weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein had squirreled-away in Iraq. This is where they came up with the line, "Bush lied and people died." At the very same moment, every Democrat in congress was marching in front of the eager media cameras to bludgeon the Bush administration about the fighting in Iraq. It was an ugly ugly period. In the end, President Bush saved the day in Iraq by first capturing Saddam Hussein, then holding free elections in Iraq, and, finally, undertaking the take and hold military strategy that Bush and his allies called the "Surge." It was the wonderfully successful Surge that made it finally possible for the USA to declare final victory in Iraq. It was during the surge that Iraqi cities such as Mosul were captured and occupied by American GI's. Nevertheless, the constant griping about the Iraq War undertaken by Congressional Democrats made it imperative for Obama - at least in his own ultra far left mind - to pull out of Iraq when he came to power in These United States. Had he not been an ultra-far-left ideologue, he would've at least left a strong enough American troop contingent - say about 10,000 American Troops -in residence in Iraq so that evil forces did not flow into Iraq to fill the void that was predictably created when the USA, per Obama and Hillary's direction, cut and left town. The American practice and tradition through the years has been to leave at least a representative contingent of troops in place, so that nations that were the scene of fighting do not then become the scene of profound evil. Without the American troops that Hillary and Obama pulled out of Iraq (not a single American GI was left behind beyond the handful left to guard the American Embassy), ISIS slithered in and filled the void left behind. Without American troops on scene, literally tens of thousands of human beings have been killed in the inevitable ISIS-led carnage. Tens of thousands more human beings will still die, beginning right now in Mosul, where the Kurds and some new Iraqi troops are trying to oust ISIS. One of Trumps' certain victories in the debate Wednesday night was when he scolded Obama and Hillary for their absurd, really feckless practice of making public announcements about upcoming troop movements and war strategy. As Trump pointed out, ISIS leaders knew three months ago that USA client soldiers, backed by USA air power, will attempt to drive ISIS out of Mosul. Such advance notice, Trump pointed out, provided top ISIS leaders plenty of advance notice to get out of Mosul before the fighting started, lest they become prisoners of war.
Of course, where would Obama send any prisoners? Our facility for holding such scum is being closed by Obama. You know which facility I speak of: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. All of the prisoners there - those fine human beings who killed and maimed many many American troops - have been freed by Obama.
I would dearly love for Hillary Clinton to prove me wrong about what I say about her. It is deeply hurtful to me, and, I gather, tens of millions of other American Citizens, to have to contemplate even the possibility that she could be elected President. I have prayed that America be spared such a possibility.
I would love for Hillary to explain how it was a good idea for her to enable a deal that provided Russia with enough Uranium to wipe the United States and all the rest of the Western World off of the map and out of existence. I would love for her to explain how she can ethically and morally give speeches to white-collar rich folk saying she wants the United States-Mexican border to be a thing of the past. She doesn't want a real border between the two nations. But now, a few months the speeches to wealthy Wall Street and Banking conglomerates, with the scene now being the autumn presidential campaign, she addresses the voting public like she is the ultimate military war hawk. Of course, Hillary didn't think, when talking to the rich folk, that Wikileaks would get a copy of the transcript and leak it out to the public. Now, her staffs on the respective Democratic Newspapers have to work extra hard to make sure no word about the Wikileaks gets to the public. She has even managed to have the Ecuadorians shut off internet access to Julian Assange, the Wikileaks mover and shaker who is staying in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London less he be locked up by English Authorities in connection with his alleged involvement in this or that. It is Assange who has the Wikileaks material on Hillary, and is releasing it in batches every day up until election day in These United States. Unless the public becomes animated by what they heard last night, it is likely that most of them will go to the polls absent an understanding of the filthy, conniving, debauched, and - were there any real legal body willing to enforce federal law - criminal acts that Hillary has engaged in. The Wikileaks material provides amazing detail of those awful activities. Hillary wants that material buried or destroyed. She wants that in the worst possible way. She will get her way unless the Wikileaks are expounded on in public.
Hillary says in the debate that all of her new social spending proposals will not add to the national debt. She says she will tax the wealthy to collect enough money to pay for it all.
Anyone with even half of a brain knows that is false and really nonsensical. There are not enough rich people on the face of the entire earth to pay for Hillary's wild-eyed spending plans, including the many started by Obama that she says she intends to continue and, in most cases, increase or enhance. Hillary will continue Obama's tact of slicing the military deeper than the bone. The Navy already looks like a joke. Beyond the military, Hillary will then come up with some Obamaesque way of raising taxes on the middle class - can you say 'Obamacare?' - because that is all that will be left for a Hillary regime to squeeze money from.
In the debate Wednesday Night, Hillary said "I want to enhance benefits for our poorest workers."
Huh?
We are going to pay benefits; i.e., cash, to Americans who are fully employed but not making a wage or salary that is high enough to support a cushy-enough lifestyle to satisfy Hillary and friends.
Benefits for people who are fully employed? I think a program that pays money to people already working just to enhance their lifestyle is Marxist by definition, but what do I know?
I can report today that I have not listened to any post-debate chatter, but I don't think Trump performed as well as he is capable of. I cannot believe that he didn't come loaded for bear over the Wikileaks and the James O'Keefe revelations about who started the violence at the Trump rallies over the summer. For several months, every major well-attended Trump campaign rally featured protesters outside who just managed to get people trying to attend the rally to get into a fist fight, which the media breathlessly reported. These resulting media reports all gave the impression that Trump supporters were all redneck brawlers itching for a confrontation. The Wikileaks revelations prove, conclusively, that Hillary, Obama, and their confederates were intentionally seeding those protesters with people trained in starting a brawl. They even had people expert in getting female Trump supporters to start swinging.
If there was any ethics left in the mainstream media, you wouldn't be reading about the Wikileaks here. You'd know from media reports that Hillary et al are at the heart of every brawl, every filthy dirty trick, every bold-faced sign laced with profanity. But you don't see any media reports about these revelations. The media knows if they covered the Wikileaks, Trump would surely be the next President.
This is shameful. This is terrible. This is un-American in every possible way.
At the debate, Trump should've described and embellished the Wikileaks story until he was blue in the face. You should be falling asleep at night to the sound of Trump screaming "Go Read the Wikileaks Stuff.
Instead, I fell asleep knowing at the very least that I'd have to listen to three more weeks of ultra left trash extolling the attributes of Hillary Clinton. I know any listing of her attributes has to be so short that it would be over in half a second. But then they are repeated and repeated.
The whole thing is one great long nightmare.
No comments:
Post a Comment